
Hybrid audio call, December 3, 2013
=======================================

Participants: Lucjan, Chulhee, Savvas, Kjell, Roland


Agenda:
===========


1) Database processing:

   HD02   : replacement of HRCs 

   HD06   : status

   WVGA02 : all issues resolved?


2) Other


Call:
===============


1) Database processing:

   HD02   : Replacement of HRCs done.
            Lucjan is burning Blueray disc, and hopes everything is fine.
            The updates are available on drop box on account (the updates only).
            The rest of the data is on the ftp site. 
            Probably updates will be uploaded tomorrow.
            --> Lucjan will write email if he considers the updates to be finalized.
            Then, proponents can check them.

   HD06   : no update

   WVGA02 : If there is no further issue by tomorrow, database is finalized
            Subjective test can probably not start before January (due to office move).
            It is not sure that the subjective test can be finished before the meeting.
            
            --> please Kun, clean up folder, thanks (please put pcap-files, avi-files in 
                one single folder, and all old files in an 'old' folder).

            Savvas thinks that downsampling in HRC11 is really very strong.
            Silvio: is not sure if criterion of test plan will be met (at least equal MOS as in HRC4)
            Kjell will check HRC11 again.
            


2) Bug-fixing and submission of objective scores:

   As not all data is available, bug-fixing cannot be finished, as new bugs might appear.
   
   To avoid having to perform more than one bug-fixing session, proponents decided:
   --> bugfixing will be performed at next meeting in Boulder.
   
   For the submission of objective scores, a proposition is to submit objective scores with and
   without bug fixes.

   Some proponents would prefer to avoid to submit objective scores before all decisions about
   the acceptance of bug fixes have been made. In this case, objective scores would not be
   available before all data is finalized.

   Another possibility is that proponents send objective scores with accepted bugfixes performed,
   at least for the finalised data sets.

   --> this topic will be re-discussed at the next audio call, where a decision should be reached.
   
   This could be by setting a deadline for data processing.
   




